Educators’ Perceptions and Refletions on a Hybrid International Webinar on Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning in Education

Authors

  • Metta Liana Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Asep Kadarohman Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Won Koo Lee Sogang University
  • Sun Yeoul Lee Sogang University
  • Triannisa Rahmawati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Harianti Harianti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/abdi.v8i3.2062

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence in education, Community engagement, Deep learning pedagogy

Abstract

Rapid educational transformation driven by pedagogical reform and digital advancement has increased demands for educators to adapt their professional practice. In Indonesia, the introduction of deep learning as a pedagogical orientation alongside the expanding use of Artificial Intelligence has created a growing need for professional learning that connects emerging educational developments with practice. This community engagement initiative addressed this need through an accessible professional learning opportunity delivered via a hybrid international webinar integrating global perspectives with national educational priorities. The program combined onsite and online participation and included three sessions focusing on teacher professionalism, deep learning as a meaningful pedagogical orientation, and the pedagogical use of Artificial Intelligence. Participant feedback was gathered through a post-activity reflection survey consisting of closed-ended and open-ended items, with responses examined using descriptive and thematic approaches. Participant responses indicated high perceived relevance and professional value of the webinar: 69.3% strongly agreed that the content was relevant to their professional needs, while 70.1% strongly agreed that the activity provided new perspectives, skills, and insights. Open-ended reflections highlighted the importance of continuous professional development, meaningful and student-centered learning, and the responsible pedagogical use of Artificial Intelligence. Participants also reflected on international educational perspectives in relation to their own professional contexts. These findings suggest that structured academic webinars can provide an accessible initial professional learning opportunity for educators engaging with emerging pedagogical and technological development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

Bragg, L. A., Walsh, C., & Heyeres, M. (2021). Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 166, 104158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104158

Brandão, A., Pedro, L., & Zagalo, N. (2024). Teacher professional development for a future with generative artificial intelligence – an integrative literature review. Digital Education Review, (45), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2024.45.151-157

Braun, V., & Clarke, Victoria. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cáceres, M., Nussbaum, M., & Ortiz, J. (2020). Integrating critical thinking into the classroom: A teacher’s perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100674

Chauncey, S. A., & McKenna, H. P. (2023). A framework and exemplars for ethical and responsible use of AI Chatbot technology to support teaching and learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100182

Chung, E. (2023). Eleven factors contributing to the effectiveness of dialogic reflection: understanding professional development from the teacher’s perspective. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 18(2), 268–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2021.2013234

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Fourth Edi). Pearson Education, Inc.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, John. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

de Jong, L., Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). School-based collaboration as a learning context for teachers: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101927

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Dille, K. B., & Røkenes, F. M. (2021). Teachers’ professional development in formal online communities: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103431

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. Melani. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260645

Ding, A.-C. E., Shi, L., Yang, H., & Choi, I. (2024). Enhancing teacher AI literacy and integration through different types of cases in teacher professional development. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100178

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, Joanne. (2018). Deep Learning: Engage the World Change the World. Corwin.

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

Kemendikdasmen. (2025a). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Nomor 13 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 12 Tahun 2024 tentang Kurikulum pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah.

Kemendikdasmen. (2025b, January 20). Penguatan Kompetensi Guru untuk Pendekatan Deep Learning. https://www.kemendikdasmen.go.id/siaran-pers/11755-penguatan-kompetensi-guru-untuk-pendekatan-deep-learning

Kemendikdasmen. (2025c, June 14). Kemendikdasmen Dorong Guru Mempunyai Kompetensi Pembelajaran Mendalam. https://www.kemendikdasmen.go.id/siaran-pers/13022-kemendikdasmen-dorong-guru-mempunyai-kompetensi-pembelajaran-mendalam

Meyer, A., Kleinknecht, M., & Richter, D. (2023). What makes online professional development effective? The effect of quality characteristics on teachers’ satisfaction and changes in their professional practices. Computers & Education, 200, 104805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104805

Miao, Fengchun., & Cukurova, Mutlu. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers . UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

OECD. (2020). Education responses to COVID-19: Embracing digital learning and online collaboration. http://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.

Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019). Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: a systematic meta-aggregative review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1145–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8

Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305

Shin, J. K., Borup, J., Barbour, M. K., & Quiroga Velasquez, R. V. (2022). Webinars for English Language Teachers During the Pandemic: Global Perspectives on Transitioning to Remote Online Teaching. AERA Open, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221083976

Sperling, K., Stenberg, C.-J., McGrath, C., Åkerfeldt, A., Heintz, F., & Stenliden, L. (2024). In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169

Tan, X., Cheng, G., & Ling, M. H. (2025). Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Liana, M., Kadarohman, A., Lee, W. K., Lee, S. Y., Rahmawati, T., & Harianti, H. (2026). Educators’ Perceptions and Refletions on a Hybrid International Webinar on Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning in Education. Abdi: Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 8(3), 1008–1016. https://doi.org/10.24036/abdi.v8i3.2062